Monday, February 25, 2008

Nixon had notion to use nuclear bomb in Vietnam

COLLEGE PARK, Md. (AP) — Thinking big, President Nixon raised the idea of using a nuclear bomb against North Vietnam in 1972, but Henry Kissinger quickly dismissed the notion.

"I'd rather use the nuclear bomb," Nixon told Kissinger, his national security adviser, a few weeks before he ordered a major escalation of the Vietnam War.

"That, I think, would just be too much," Kissinger replied softly in his baritone voice, in a conversation uncovered among 500 hours of Nixon tapes released Thursday.

Nixon responded matter-of-factly. "The nuclear bomb. Does that bother you?" he asked. Then he closed the subject by telling Kissinger: "I just want you to think big."

He also said "I don't give a damn" about civilians killed by U.S. bombing.

That exchange in the Executive Office Building on April 25, 1972, is contained in the largest batch of tapes ever released by the National Archives. Altogether, roughly 1,700 of the 3,700 hours of Nixon White House tapes have now come out.

Most of the newly released tapes were recorded between January and June 1972.

They offer insights into Nixon's historic trip to China in February of that year — and the mating habits of two pandas he received as a gift.

"The only way they learn how is to watch other pandas mate, you see," Nixon said in a phone conversation with a columnist for The Washington Star.

In June 1972, Nixon and chief of staff H.R. Haldeman can be heard worrying about the erratic behavior — late-night telephone calls to reporters, for instance — of Martha Mitchell, the outspoken wife of campaign manager John Mitchell. She had complained about political dirty tricks.

"The woman is sick," Nixon said.

Nixon and his aides are heard talking over ways to limit the fallout if the White House is implicated in the break-in at the Democratic National Committee at the Watergate. The plan: Blame John Mitchell, saying he was so busy trying to control his wife that he was not minding the campaign.

Other Watergate-related tapes include the infamous 18 1/2-minute gap, an erased segment three days after the break-in. The gap — a series of whirs, clicks and buzzes — was released in the 1970s. But the poor quality of the tape makes conversations before and after the gap unintelligible, too.

Facing re-election in 1972, Nixon worries aloud on one tape that if America lost the Vietnam War and the Soviets pulled out of a coming arms-control summit, his political career would be history. He says he would pull out of the presidential race and back former Texas Gov. John Connally for the GOP nomination.

He told Kissinger, "The point is, we have to realize that if we lose Vietnam and the summit, there's no way that the election can be saved."

The summit was not canceled and soon Nixon was escalating the war. The president signed arms agreements with the Soviets in Moscow and tried to pin the blame for the assassination attempt against George Wallace on liberals in an effort to boost his own political prospects.

After hearing of the shooting, Nixon asked about Wallace's health and made sure other presidential candidates were adequately protected. Then he turned to using the incident for political advantage.

Within hours of the shooting, Nixon is heard on the tapes stirring up rumors that the suspect, Arthur Bremer, was a left-winger with connections to the Kennedys.

Nixon can be heard on one tape whispering the rumors in the background as his adviser Chuck Colson, on the phone with the FBI's Mark Felt, passes on that Bremer and his associates might be "Kennedy friends."

"I'll be sure and pass that along," Felt says.

The war weighed heavily on Nixon's mind.

"We can't lose 50,000 Americans and lose this war," Nixon told comedian Bob Hope on April 15.

Nixon's thoughts about the nuclear bomb could have reflected mere frustration with the war or been part of a strategy to make the North Vietnamese believe he was a madman and could not be restrained — and so they should negotiate peace.

"It was politically unacceptable," Vietnam historian Stanley Karnow said of the prospects of using the bomb. "Just because he said it doesn't mean it was really an option."

The tapes are replete with Nixon blurting out outlandish remarks, said Nixon historian Stanley Kutler, who clamped on earphones to listen to the tapes at the archives complex outside Washington.

"It's a frustrated, angry, confused president lashing out and calling on what he had access to, to defeat an intractable enemy," Kutler said, adding that he believed Nixon was not serious about dropping the bomb.

In May, Nixon reminds Kissinger that civilians are an unfortunate casualty of all wars.

"The only place where you and I disagree ... is with regard to the bombing," Nixon said. "You're so goddamned concerned about the civilians and I don't give a damn. I don't care."

"I'm concerned about the civilians because I don't want the world to be mobilized against you as a butcher," Kissinger said. "We can do it without killing civilians."

---

Source:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2002/02/28/nixon-tapes.htm

Tuesday, February 5, 2008

MONEY & POWER

What if there was a world? A world where money does not control people but people control themselves for the benefit of others? Money is the source of all evil, without money one cannot cope with society. Without money one is not capable of cooperating with mankind. Money separates the rich and the poor, money cause war in small countries. Money enslaves people for the richer nations. USA is a prime example of a global market exploiter that uses money to enslave smaller nations. Poor countries such as ones of Asia endure sweat shops, and child slavery for price of one bread a day, when export to America the shoes are valued of over 200 dollars. Why does America not develop their own shoes with exploitation of their own children and citizens? The message is clear, America exchange blood with money to make more money.

Imagine a world with NO money, instead a world when everyone comes together to work for one purpose, to enhance the life of mankind for the benefit of all mankind, to live in peace and harmony without seeing a difference in ourselves. This money world we live in does not provide such benefits. Instead richer nations are the only nations to enjoy life when nations in Africa, Middle East and Asia suffer life deterioration.

The war in Iraq that is going on is to provide enough fuel for America's economy to run, without this oil America's economy will come to halt and lead of America as richest nation in the world will decline... this will eventually cause the CIA to sabotage third world countries for the benefit of America's economy. Freedom is a statement often used by Americans, but without their cheap shoes, clothes and food exploited from countries that barely have enough to eat, then there wouldn't be freedom at all for this exploiter nation.

Money is power. Ever heard of that saying? What about people? Everybody has a value, and that value becomes money. People kill each other for money. Everyone has a price on their head some are priceless however it all comes down to money to get dirty jobs done. Because money simply controls the mankind, it is the prime resource of survival. CIA use this so called money to initiate countries to fight within itself to turn against their own this has been done in IRAQ, in Viet Nam, in IRAN, in YUGOSLAVIA, in KOREA and there is really no end to it.

If we lived in a world where money was not a problem, if we live in a world where "points" or "marks" are given for jobs instead of money. Where everyone can work and play at the same time, when everyone can enjoy what the rich of today can only enjoy. Where the world unites and enhances our ability to discover life and glory of science. If this had ever happened mankind would've made it to mars already. However the greediness of rulers in each nation prevents this utopia to ever happen. One day America will rule the world with money and we cannot do anything about it. Communism had been blamed for genocides all over the world, but America has done equal damage without being blamed? Money keeps people's mouth shut, media is sponsored by money.

In the future America will install a chip into every human being that will track their life history that can locate a person anywhere they are around the world, that controls their income, their health etc. RFID chip is to be installed into every human being on May 2008. The reason America says is to track a person's health, but is health really the matter of this device? One day everyone in America will only be a number, a product like ones in the supermarket. Each number will have a value, and if the number misuses their privilege in society, their chip will malfunction and their credit in society will be annihilated. This was what the war with the USSR or Soviet Union was all about, so they can take over the world and control people for themselves.

Will there be resistance?


Perhaps they will allow people who refuse to install RFID however those people will be limited in society, that means they cannot travel, they cannot drink, buy cigarettes, healthcare etc. Everyone will simply be a product of the USA. This is the beginning of NWO (New World Order) when America takes over the world with money millions of lives will be lost. It may not happen in this generation, but it will definitely begin in the next generation.


-VNTIGER

Friday, January 18, 2008

History Channel , Biography - Ho Chi Minh



"Hồ Chí Minh (May 19, 1890 – September 2, 1969) was a Vietnamese revolutionary and statesman, who later became Prime Minister (1946–1955) and President (1955–1969) of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

Ho is most famous for leading the Viet Minh independence movement from 1941 onward, establishing the communist-governed Democratic Republic of Vietnam in 1945 and defeating the French Union in 1954 at Dien Bien Phu. "

Notice how the Englishman complimented uncle Ho Chi Minh for his patriotism but the Vichoco argues otherwise.

-VNTIGER

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Vichoco are the ultimate hypocrite.

Viet Nam has been admitted in WTO on march 2006. Viet Nam's embargo was lifted in 1995 through decision of president Bill Clinton (personally I think Mr. Clinton was the best president that America had since Washington).

Viet Nam was blasted back to the stone ages during the American War as General Curtis LeMay suggested by deploying rapid B52 attacks. The French colonist lost in Dien Bien Phu 1954 so they've deployed a rapid bombing on Hai Phong harbor. American left Viet Nam and set an embargo against Viet Nam due to discriminatory of differences so that Viet Nam could not trade with any of American allies. After 1991 Viet Nam's only ally the Soviet Bloc have shattered leaving Viet Nam to fend for itself. Viet Nam and China's dispute have not ended until 1992.

Please review those information and then related them to Viet Nam today. In my opinion Viet Nam have done an excellent job throughout it's suffering American war aftermath...

Lets talk about the Vichoco or Viet Chong Cong as they call themselves or American racial slender "Viet Ching Chong". This is what they say. "Because of the VC. Viet Nam is poor." First and foremost the VC (real is name NLF) liberated and united with North Viet Nam. The VC were short for Viet Cong or American racial slander "Charlie - Victor Charlie". The Viet Cong were coalitions from the central and southern province united with a common goal to free Sai Gon from American's control. To the ignorant Vichoco, VC does not exist anymore if you want to blame Viet Nam for something the party is called Dang Cong San Viet Nam.

Now Viet Nam is a poor country because of the Party? Please review the beginning paragraphs and lets move on. Lets compare Viet Nam to other sea countries. Viet Nam was an colony for the French while other SEA countries were for England and Philippines was for Spain. Lets start with Philippines, they rebelled against Spain for their independence closing in on their goal, America came in and "helped" them fought against each other and later setup their colony in the Philippines to expose their potential resources. Philippines GDP today is only around 400 billion for a colony of America, I find that figure very pathetic. Philippines was said to be the next big thing to Japan and now you see them trying to catch up to Thailand. If you have ever traveled to the Philippines you would realize that they have completely lost their culture. Everywhere you go every street you visit you see English street signs & American franchises. This could've been Viet Nam's potential damage if Viet Nam was to lose to America.

How about Thailand? Thailand have been free from foreign invasion since Viet Nam was under French's clustered feet. Thailand's GDP figure today is only around 500 billion. Would this be a considerables rate for a country that had never seen the light of a true war? Remember America have bombed in Viet Nam much more than all of WWII combine (or estimates of 7 times Hiroshima in Quang Tri). Thailand had to purchase rice from Viet Nam and ship it to Viet Nam's barrier. That's why after America's embargo was lifted you hear about Viet Nam being the main supplier for rice goods.

How about Japan? Lots of Vichoco thing Viet Nam could catch up to Japan if they have won the war. First of all like the Philipinese our country was dominated by foreigners for centuries. Second of all our country has a really high population for a small amount of GDP. How about Japan? They were imperialist like America and British who conquered much of Asia including Korea for centuries. They were so powerful that Hitler asked for their alliance. They've exploited Viet Nam, China, Korea for their own benefit. Was Japan ever poor? Even the nuclear warhead did not affect their wealth. Vichoco brainless to think that Viet Nam could ever be like Japan with only $500,000 billion American spent to purchase them. South Viet Nam was an American toy bought from the French.

If Viet Nam wasn't so punished since 1954-2008 I have no doubt that we would be half if not more of comparing to Japan's GDP. Vichoco are sitting around blaming things on the "communist" blaming Ho Chi Minh (one who have live the most overwhelming life) for his damage caused to Viet Nam while they praised Ngo Dinh Diem for his patriotism... First and foremost Ngo Dinh Diem was a Mandarin (colonial official) catholic who lived a god's life under colonist France administration controlling over Vietnamese plantation. His father used Phan Dinh Phung's ashes to execute other revolutionaries. Ngo Dinh Diem was also very prejudice towards Buddhism and also carries an extreme sadistic hatred for any one suspected of being a Viet Cong. Matter of fact, he used that excuse to eliminate monks who protested against him.

So what does Vichoco have to do with anything? They complain that Viet Nam is living under the Chinese influence, they claim that we are "Dogs for the Chinese". Lets see just about a month ago a protest burst in the city of Ha Noi and Ho Chi Minh City with Anti-Chinese slogans etc. over Vietnamese Hoang Sa and Truong Sa. This was permitted by the Government to go on for over 2 hours until it was broken up by police. Also what was that Sino-Vietnamese War in 1979 all about if Viet Nam was such "Dogs" to Chinese? This is a typical Vichoco, they take humiliation from Westerners (White American) and takes it out on their own... Calling their "own" "Dogs".

This is the conclusion, they haven't realized it but Vichoco are hypocrites because they are dogs themselves because they were and still are hailing to Ngo Dinh Diem (A Mandarin Descendant). Also have you ever talked to a Vichoco? If you are Vietnamese and you approach them with patriotic speech about Viet Nam they will say "If you love Viet Nam so much then why don't you go back". Well I wonder how many times an American have said to them "Get the hell out of my country "Chink/Gook"". They also run around with French colonist flag taunting Viet Nam about "human rights" while over 5 million of Vietnamese are living with Dioxin Agent released by America during the American War. Estimated over hundred thousand tonnes were released in the tropical country. These victim should be compensated by America's war crime, however Vichoco ignores and complain about something that matters not. American are tyrants however I can make exceptions for many. But I have much more respect for American than Vichoco.

In this world we talk about warlords and terrorist. We hang Saddam because he refused to allow his nation to continuing exposing their oil to America's market. How about the warlords of America? Have you ever heard of an American president getting hung or executed? How about the Lt. William Calley for his My Lai Massecre? (he had 3 years house arrest equal lives of over hundreds of victims right?) or Nixon for his lies? Why not because America is indeed "god's number 1"... They are however #1 for international slaughtering. "God bless America."...

I never knew that god was a "DEVIL".

Please enlighten yourself and ask if you have questions.

-VNTIGER

Saturday, December 29, 2007

Vietnam: American Holocaust

I've recently encounter a video that some anonymous have made about the war with very much details about Viet Nam war. I agree over 90% with this video. Please watch and enlighten yourself.



"The United States killed between 3 and 5 million people in the Vietnam War. This feature looks at the history of that war and the how and why it happened using interviews with participates on both sides, speeches, conversation and actual wartime footage. Contains graphic violence."

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-8944817304139359835&q=vietnam&total=62245&start=180&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

"Why do they hate us so much?" - isometry.com

I've recently found a new post about America's "deeds" in the world.

Please visit http://www.isometry.com/usahate.html and educate yourself.

"Massive war crimes in Vietnam war: The mass murder of well over 1 million (some say about 3 million) innocent Vietnamese civilians during the Vietnam war was an act of mass state terrorism. (The USA also used chemical weapons such as dioxins in this aggressive war.) The USA should have been forced to pay hundreds of billions of dollars of reparations for their war crimes. But instead, the USA imposed horrendous trade sanctions on Vietnam which led to mass starvation for many years. At the same time, the USA forced the Vietnamese to put a humiliating amount of effort into finding decades-old corpses of American war criminals. Hundreds of thousands of innocent civilian Vietnamese died without their bodies being recovered. But US citizens are capable of feeling no sympathy for any people other than their own. They think that one American is worth a thousand foreigners. There are many people in the USA even now who are proud of their participation in the mass murder and war crimes in Vietnam."

"Causing the `Asian meltdown' through oppressive loan conditions: Enforcement of completely inappropriate and humiliating conditions on Thailand through the IMF, which is controlled by the USA. In the Asian crisis of about 1997, the currency of Thailand collapsed, due to the sudden withdrawal of huge amounts of capital, mostly by the USA. As a result, there was massive unemployment, thousands of people committed suicide, and the misery continues to this day. The IMF forced Thailand to carry out even more inappropriate measures after the crisis, whereas Malaysia refused the IMF commands. Malaysia's economy improved quickly but Thailand's did not. The economies of Vietnam and China hardly noticed the Asian meltdown, because they did not follow the IMF commands."

"Attempted invasion of Cuba: Unsuccessful invasion of Cuba (1961) to install pro-US-capitalist government. Large numbers of people pointlessly killed for ideological/economic reasons, with no apology. In 2002, the US government still hates Cuba more than any country. The USA takes a very, very long time to forgive countries which successfully resist (and thereby humiliate) the US Empire. (Others include Iran and Vietnam.) The USA is a poor loser."

"USA is protectionist - but everybody else must accept free trade: In March 2002, the USA put up to 30% tariffs on steel imports to protect the inefficient US steel industry and get votes for the next election. The USA's propagandists have been on the airwaves explaining why this is a good thing. Unfortunately, the arguments they have used in favour of US protectionism, if true, are even more true for the poor countries of the world. If a rich country like the USA needs to protect its industries, then surely the poor countries have even more need. This is just typical of the USA's approach to politics - first work out what's in the USA's self-interest, then muster the arguments to support the decision. But if the same arguments are used to defend the actions of any other country, they are rejected. Somehow free trade is supposed to be good for every country in the world, but protectionism of the farm sector, the steel sector etc., is good for the USA. People in the USA just can't remember the arguments they used last month for last month's policies. The right argument for the USA is always the argument which benefits the USA this month. Protecting the workers is a good thing when the USA wants to increase the cost of production in poor countries to reduce their competitiveness, but protecting the workers is a bad thing when US companies want to exploit workers. A good example of US American protectionism is the exclusion of catfish imports from Vietnam. The USA just can't compete. So they call efficient production dumping or unfair trade. But that just means that the USA can't compete on a level playing field."

"Gulf of Tonkin incident: In 1964, the US government administration lied about the North Vietnamese attacking US ships in the Gulf of Tonkin and used this as a pretext for a massive escalation of aggression against North Vietnam. The US government's respect for truth is similar to Hitler's respect for truth when he invaded Poland because of the alleged mistreatment of Germans by the Poles."

" For a day or two after the 9-11 suicide hijacks, the whole world felt a huge sympathy for the USA. For once we saw the USA weak and vulnerable. When the USA was strutting the world stage as the selfish international bully, no one could feel affection for them. Seeing the USA weak for once made it possible to feel compassion and sympathy.

But the USA squandered the sympathy it deserved and received on 2001-9-11. If the US had been more gentle and understanding, the sympathy would have continued. But instead, the USA turned into a super-bully, much more selfish and bloodthirsty than ever before. And this is why the USA is without friends now. The USA has cashed in its international goodwill chips. There will be no chips left when the USA needs friends again some day.

The only real friend they have now is the illegitimate Australian government, which won the national election shortly after 9-11 on the basis of fear and loathing for foreigners. The Australian government needs to keep the pattern of war going so as to make them look important, and so that they can suppress dissent within Australia. I don't know why the UK government is so keen to please the USA. We know that behind the scenes, the English-speaking christian countries are very well integrated militarily. I can only assume that both the UK, US and Australia can see that Israel is endangered right now. But the Australian government tried very hard to keep the Vietnam war going when the USA wanted to stop, because it was needed domestically within Australia. The Australian government is showing the same back-seat driver enthusiasm again now. (The majority of Australians and British are opposed to the invasion of Iraq.)"

" 2005-5-4: The current kill ratio by US soldiers in Iraq is about 100:1. They've killed about 120,000 since 2003 against only 1200 of their own killed. This is even more impressive than their kill ratio of 50:1 in Vietnam where they killed 3 million innocent people for only about 50,000 lost. This may be compared with the Israeli kill ratio of only about 4:1 against the Palestinians in the last 5 years. The USA is probably the most effective killer in history. It isn't cheap though. It costs the USA more than a million dollars to kill each Iraqi. If they had to pay fair compensation for their murders, it would cost even more than that."

These quotes were recorded from the site I've mentioned above that is only related to Viet Nam, however there are plenty of other interesting insight of America's suffering towards the world mention within that website. I respect the knowledge from the website because I did not find a paragraph that I have disagreed with. I hope this will bring knowledge to others who seek.

http://www.youtube.com/vntiger

-VNTIGER

Sunday, December 9, 2007

How much does Viet Nam really hate USA?

Sai Gon, Indochina used to be the capital of the French’s colonial empire ran by Emperor Bao Dai a mandarin Catholic & the previous Nguyen Dynasties only to satisfied the Frenchman by enslaving the population of the Vietnamese people under plantations to produce goods for shipping all back to The French Empire. There was less than a few percentage of the population which would be lucky enough to be raised wealthy or royal to assist and eventually lead the colonist government just in case a breakout of rebellious militias occurred. Many attempts have been made since 1885 to 1895 by "Phan Dinh Phuong”’s & his militias, he was considered a hero. Phung's remains had not been mercy to rest in peace because Ngo Dinh Kha father of Ngo Dinh Diem who was the member of the French colonial administration used Hero Phan Dinh Phung's remain as gunpowder to execute revolutionaries.

Phan Boi Chau formed “Reformation Society” rebellions in 1903, however his quests were unsuccessful due to a French informant/betrayer by the name of Nguyen Thuong Huyen who act as if he cared about a free Viet Nam eventually reported Phan Boi Chau’s rebellious organization to the French. He was arrested from his residual in China and they imprisoned him in Ha Noi. Phan Boi Chau was aware of Ho Chi Minh since he was a friend with Ho Chi Minh’s father, he was interested in meeting him one day but never had the chance.

The French colonist government controlled Viet Nam from Tokin (North, Ha Noi), Annam (Central, Hue), Cochinchina (South, Sai Gon). Ho Chi Minh was greatly educated by the French of which he used their knowledge against them. He formed the revolutionary party the Viet Minh who took action in the First Indochina War in 1945 helping American troops repel the French Communist & the Japanese as well as seeking for American’s MIAs within the jungles. After the victory over Japan, Ho Chi Minh read the “Declaration of Independence” for the first time, however the British, French & Indian troops came into Indochina and restored the French’s control of Indochina. During 1950 Ho Chi Minh again read the “Declaration of Independence” (an American script) hoping Viet Nam to be recognized by the world’s great power including the United States of America, however his declaration was only recognized by USSR and China.

America refused to recognize Viet Nam as a solitary nation. Furthermore the victory of Dien Bien Phu in May – March 1954 have cause the Geneva Conference in France involving America, China, France, UK & USSR to settle a dispute over Viet Nam’s Independence, however the conclusion result to the Geneva Accord to allow the nation to settle it’s solidarity under a democratic election. Ho Chi Minh was keened over the decision and took it as it is, however during the reunification process America intervene with the Sai Gon government (post French administrative government) having a pre-election between Ngo Dinh Diem and Bao Dai. Diem however won his campaign in a rigged election. The final election was then between Ho Chi Minh and Ngo Dinh Diem, however America later came up with the domino theory and decided to call off the election breaking the Geneva Accord contract leaving Ho Chi Minh to be the president of Democratic Republic of Viet Nam. (North) Holding his ground Ho Chi Minh was rebuilding North Viet Nam to bring prosperity & happiness to all of the people. During the land reform process many of the wealthy post French administrative officials were refusing to contribute to the reform and fled to southern Viet Nam with all of their income.

As evil as his father; Ngo Dinh Diem also executed many revolutionaries and Buddhist leader because he was a Catholic extremist who was prejudice against the Buddhism. After he executed them his excuse was that they were insurgents, he also proclaimed Thich Quang Duc (the burning monk) as one of the insurgent’s. Diem’s wife referred Thich Quang Duc as a human barbeque and encourages more of them to burn themselves as pleased.

Let’s summarize this article about how much Ho Chi Minh “hated” America.

1. Ho Chi Minh seeks President Woodrow Wilson to help remove the French colonist government and replace it with a nationalist government but was denied.

2. Ho Chi Minh’s Viet Minh assisted America in the 1945 WWII against the French communist & Japanese axis as well as helping America locate its MIAs.

3. Ho Chi Minh proclaimed Viet Nam as Democratic Republic of Viet Nam. (Following examples from America’s Republic Democracy)

4. Ho Chi Minh read the “U.S. Declaration of Independence” throughout Viet Nam from Ha Noi on September 2, 1945.

5. Ho Chi Minh again read the “U.S. Declaration of Independence” in 1950.

6. Ho Chi Minh signed and agreed to the terms of the Geneva Accord.

7. Ho Chi Minh held ground against the unfair intervention by America to call off the Democratic election.

Ho Chi Minh have step out of his way too far to promote his friendship with America, however the tyrant refuse his goodwill and sees his kindness as his weakness. However “You can kill 10 of my men for every one of yours I kill, but in the end you will lose and I will win!”

Did Ho Chi Minh started war with America and it’s Republic of Viet Nam counterpart? No… The irony here is that there were many leads to the Viet Nam war that is beyond fair intentions.

French a WWII ally of USA was beaten and humiliated after WWII. They were beaten again in the Indochina War. When the French withdraw they did not want their post government to be handed to the victor, so they had to gather the world’s power together in France and dispute on Viet Nam’s solidarity, however as intended the country was divided. The country may have been divided into two, however America came up with the “Domino Theory” suggested by Dwight D. Eisenhower to initiate action in Viet Nam. During the reunification process a leader had to be elected by the people , however the election was dismissed and America have chosen it’s leader to repel the “communist” from “spreading”. The gate to South Viet Nam was closed, Ho Chi Minh had no hard feelings actually. North Viet Nam continued rebuilding its economy until America became tempted to start a war. America continuously funded South Viet Nam’s government with military and money. America had spent $500 billion dollars in South Viet Nam, in short terms America bought South Viet Nam. When the military was ready, America decided to provoke war with the North Vietnamese in the Gulf of Tonkin. America had crossed the border exchanging fire however they were unsuccessful so they pass a misleading draft to congress informing that both of their ships were shot down by the North Viet Navy (what the hell were they doing on the coast of North Viet Nam’s border anyway?). As the draft was passing down to congress America’s intervention with Viet Nam was approved and they engaged in a rapid b52 bombing raid in the Harbor Port of Viet Nam (Hai Phong) killing anything in its way. This is what caused the Viet Nam war. America could’ve had Viet Nam as a great, loyal ally if they have only accepted our friendship in the first place, however the only appreciation we receive is a blast to the dark ages and a new friend called agent orange. After America’s withdraw from Viet Nam, immediately set an embargo/sanction on Viet Nam in 1973 from all NATO nations isolating Viet Nam. Viet Nam’s only support was the Soviet bloc until 1992. However with the decision of President Bill Clinton embargo/sanction was dropped in 1995 which allowed Viet Nam to resume marketing with the rest of the world. Viet Nam was also admitted into WTO on January, 2006. To conclude this article; all this leads to America’s “domino theory” and other idiotic theories that caused roughly 3-5 million deaths and around 58,000 of their own. Now in the 21 century Viet Nam wants to improve relation with USA favor over China. So how much does Viet Nam really hate America?

ZERO. The American casualties were minimized because Viet Nam did not want to kill American’s during the war, actually American POW were treated humane and with respectful. The casualties for America could’ve been much higher than roughly 58,000 but ended up the majority of around 300,000 Americans troops injured. Viet Nam was only trying to warn Americans to keep away from our country, not kill you. However kindness is not a way to communicate with a killing machine. Americans had to be dragged into war by conscription; is that an ideal example of American’s conservative democracy?

Did America have any rights to intervene with Viet Nam’s solidarity?

“If you don’t want to help us then leave us alone, but instead you caused us a pain we can never forget.”

-VNTIGER

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=vntiger